Pages

Monday, November 25, 2013

Nations & View towards 2 Cows !!

Traditional Economics

You have two cows. You sell one and buy a bull. Your hers multiplies and
the economy grows. You retire on the income.


Indian Economics

You have two cows. You worship them.


Pakistan Economics

You don't have any cows. You claim that the Indian cows belong to you. You
ask the US for financial aid, China for military, British for Warplanes,
Italy for machines, Germany for technology, French for submarines,
Switzerland for loans, Russia for drugs and Japan for equipment. You buy
the cows with all this and claim exploitation by the world.


American Economics

You have two cows. You sell one and force the other to produce the milk of
four cows. You profess surprise when the cow drops dead. You put the blame
on some nation with cows & naturally that nation will be a danger to
mankind. You wage a war to save the world and grab the cows.


French Economics

You have two cows. You go on strike because you want three cows.


German Economics

You have two cows. You reengineer them so that they live for 100 years,
eat once a month and milk themselves.


British Economics

You have two cows. They are both mad cows.


Italian Economics

You have two cows. You don't know where they are. You break for lunch.


Swiss Economics

You have 5000 cows, none of which belong to you. You charge others for
storing them.


Japanese Economics

You have two cows. You redesign them so that they are one-tenth the size
of an ordinary cow and produce twenty times the milk. You then create cute
cartoon cow images called Cowkimon and market them worldwide.


Russian Economics

You have two cows. You count them and learn you have five cows. You count
them again and learn you have 42 cows. You count them again and learn you
have 17 cows. You give up counting and open another bottle of vodka.


Chinese Economics

You have two cows. You have 300 people milking them. You claim full
employment, high bovine productivity and arrest anyone reporting the
actual numbers.

No comments: